Verizon iPhone 5 customers may have noticed an issue wherein their phones gobbled up extra cellular data when they were theoretically connected to Wi-Fi networks. Those customers now have two bits of good news: There’s a special software update that fixes the problem, and they won’t be responsible for unexpected charges related to unintended network overages related to the issue that spurred the carrier update in the first place.
The number of companies planning to hire tech professionals continues to grow, with 33% of the 334 IT executives who responded to Computerworld's 2013 Forecast survey saying they plan to increase head count in the next 12 months..
Apple on Monday began reminding some iCloud users that they will soon lose the 20GB of free storage they'd received when they migrated from MobileMe.
Barnes and Noble Tuesday announced that Nook Video will premiere this fall in the U.S. and UK. The service will offer access to movies and TV shows for streaming and download.
A little planning can save time - and voice messages - when you upgrade to the new iPhone 5
"Why is IE still relevant and why is it worth spending money on rendering engines when there are open source ones available that can respond to changes in Web standards faster?"
"That's cheeky. A good question, but cheeky," Ballmer said.
Indeed it is. If I was a Microsoft share holder I would want to know why Microsoft is sinking so much money into its own Web browser rendering engine when there are others available for free. Good thing the chairs in Sydney's Exhibition Centre are all bolted down.
Ballmer began his answer philosophically, saying Microsoft will need to look at what the browser is like in the future and, if there is no innovation around them, which he thinks is "likely", Microsoft may still need its own browser because of proprietary extensions that broaden its functionality.
"There will still be a lot of proprietary innovation in the browser itself so we may need to have a rendering service," he said.
Then came the startling revelation that Microsoft may also adopt an open source browser engine.
"Open source is interesting," he said. "Apple has embraced Webkit and we may look at that, but we will continue to build extensions for IE 8."
Ballmer also admitted Microsoft got delayed with the transition from IE 6 to IE7 during the development of Longhorn, which became Vista. "But I don't what to go there."
Developers want money
Another question arose from the recent success of Apple's App Store and Facebook for helping independent developers make money via the host vendors application delivery mechanism. Ballmer wants to do more here for Microsoft developers.
"Making money is a good thing and with some of the competitive opportunities I don't think anyone is making any money," he said. "Some good work is being done with Facebook and the iPhone where it's easy for developers to distribute applications. It's easier to get exposure. Not much money is being made, but giving developers a way to get more visibility of their code is a good idea.
"Microsoft can do more here. We are not ready to talk about opportunities, but fear not! We are hard at work, particularly with Facebook."
Looks like Microsoft is working on a more streamlined way to bring more ISVs (emphasis on independent) into its technology stack before the are irreversibly lost to competing platforms. A well marketed application repository is the perfect way to achieve this.
New products
What gets Steve Ballmer excited when it comes to new products? Well, there's Steve Ballmer the user and Steve Ballmer the developer evangelist.
"From a user perspective I'm excited by Windows Mobile 7 and the next release of Windows Live at end of the year," he said.
As a developer, Ballmer sees a bright future for integration of SharePoint with the cloud-based SharePoint online. Also on the cards is porting the Microsoft Access database front end to SharePoint. "The productivity benefits for business applications and the tools we are building, with Microsoft Access as a front end, will make it a higher-level development environment," he said. "Writing applications with SharePoint will be pretty attractive for some people."
Human computing is the future
To finish his keynote, Ballmer began prognosticating about what computers will be like 10 years from now.
If someone asked me what's the best profession to recommend people get into - that's software development," he said. "So much more innovation will be created in the next 10 years. Ten years from now we will look back and say how primitive life was back then."
"We will talk to computers and they will respond. Everything we touch will be an electronic surface connected to the Internet. Everything will be automatically streamed. There is sure a lot of software left writing in this world.
Asked by moderator Tim O'Reilly, CEO of O'Reilly Media, for his opinion about dismissive comments Oracle CEO Larry Ellison made recently about SaaS as little more than an empty buzzword, Benioff quoted ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu, author of The Art of War.
"'When weak, feign strength.' That's the right approach for him. [But it's not] the right approach for these companies that are strong and developing and have tremendous organic growth," Benioff said, referring to his company, partner Google, and the other two represented on the panel, VMware and Adobe. "We've embraced these new technologies."
But Benioff wasn't finished, and a few minutes later hit out again at his former boss Ellison, saying that the SaaS approach can't be compared with "mature, dying models like Oracle and SAP, which is maybe already dead."
Girouard also had choice words for traditional enterprise software vendors, saying that they haven't learned from the successes of Web-based software for consumers, and are thus failing to meet the expectations of those same consumers when they go to work.
"There's an amazing disconnect between the innovation and user experiences delivered in the consumer world and the stagnant, unenlightened world of enterprise computing that puts the user experience far in the background and focuses on business process," he said.
The modus operandi of Google's Enterprise unit is to adapt the company's consumer Web applications for the enterprise market, so that their ease of use and friendly interfaces carries over to the workplace, thus meshing the best of both worlds, he said.
Girouard also said he welcomed Microsoft's recent announcements of its SaaS strategy, including its Azure Web application development platform and Web-hosted version of Office. Since the introduction of the Google Apps hosted collaboration and communication suite, Girouard has said that judging it against Microsoft Office is a faulty "apples to oranges" comparison.
When Microsoft releases Web Applications for Office, then it will be possible to measure it against Google Apps. "And our apples will taste better," Girouard said.
source:http://www.infoworld.com
First came the fervent and persistent rumours of a Google mobile phone.Then, just six short weeks ago, the search supremo (and just-about-everything-else-online supremo) announced there would not be a ‘Google phone' per se, but rather dozens of them from a raft of mobile manufacturers, and all built on an open Linux-based mobile phone platform named Android.
Now things are picking up steam, with Gizmodo posting a snap of one of the rumoured score of prototype phones circulating around the Googleplex and in the r&d labs of the mobile makers.
The device looks very much like it's been cobbled together from existing chassis designs by Taiwan's HTC, which is responsible for a estimated 80% of the world's Windows Mobile smartphones (not just under its own brand but through badge-engineering for dozens of carriers and exclusive OEM/ODM contracts with several tech companies).(HTC is also one of the leading partners in the Open Handset Alliance, which Google created as a hothouse for Android -- the consortium's roster of 34 tech companies also includes handset makers Samsung, Motorola and LG.)
And yes, this big drab-looking device is dog ugly - but this isn't a slick made-for-media concept phone, it's merely a functional prototype on which the developers and engineers can tinker (and we all know that as rule, they're not big on elegant design).
Right now, it's what sits inside the phone that is most important. You can bet that if Google's handset partners lift the covers on their Android phones during the Mobile World Congress expo, which kicks off on February 11th in Barcelona - or if Google itself trots out a flock of phones to impress this annual powerhouse gathering of the global mobile industry (the company has booked two stands on the expo floor) - that these will be shiny snazzy models endowed with a very high ‘cool' factor.
None the less, they'll still be concept models to capture and ignite the attention of the market, the media and the public at large. Android isn't expected to hit 1.0 stage until the second half of 2008, so right now it's still a work in progress.
What we already now about Android is that its foundation is the Linux 2.6 kernel, onto which Google has assembled sufficient components to create a phone-centric OS.
With a small icon selection strip running across the foot of the screen the UI looks somewhat similar to that of prototype mobile internet devices from Intel's ultra-mobile platform, as both are designed with very small screens in mind.
In that regard, Android's interface also takes some cues from the Sidekick and Hiptop family of devices. This is not surprising, considering that the one of the founders of Android (which Google acquired in July 2005) is Andy Rubin, who also founded Danger, the company behind the Sidekick/Hiptop line. Rubin now leads the Android team.
A demo of Android posted on YouTube's Android Developer Channel shows the top level UI menu, in which the user scrolls horizontally through a carousel of icons to launch the relevant application. However, later iterations could spawn limited sub-menus, so that a generic mail icon could contains the selections for email and SMS/MMS messaging, or a ‘chat' icon could include SMS/MMS plus the instant message client.
The inbuilt browser is based on the Apple-developed WebKit open source project which underpins the iPhone's impressive implementation of Safari. As a result, Web pages viewed on Android appear with the same fidelity as if viewed on a full-blown desktop client.
The demo also shows an innovative ‘visual history' that represents recently-visited sites not as a test list but a series of thumbnail images of the actual pages you viewed.
Android also appears capable of some sweet graphics, with Open GL software to provide basic 3D capabilities out of the box plus hardware acceleration if the device is fitted with a graphics processor chip.
The YouTube video showcases smooth rendering and manipulation of a ‘virtual Earth' globe in Android's world time applet, then hammers home the point with a quick demo of Quake running on Android. And with NVIDIA having also signed up to the Open Handset Alliance, you can bet that Android's graphics capabilities will come in for plenty of attention.
Central to the Android architecture is the SQL Lite database engine, which is made available to all applications - it could also be worth noting that SQL Lite is used for Google Gears, the offline implementation of online-only Web apps.
While open source provides the heart of Android, its brain is a surprisingly modest ARM 9-series processor running at 200MHz. By way of comparison, the BlackBerry Pearl and Curve run a 312MHz processor, Nokia's flagship smartphones hover around 300-350MHz, the Motorola RAZR2 beefs up with a 500MHZ chip while the iPhone packs a 620MHz engine.
The ARM processor is also the x86 of the mobile phone landscape, being used by most mobile makers, so it makes perfect sense for the OHA to set this as the processing platform for Android.
However, given that Intel is a member of the OHA and in June 2006 offloaded its own ARM-based XScale PXA silicon to Marvell (also an OHA signatory), we expect Intel will push to put its forthcoming Menlow 2008 and Moorestown 2010 mobile device platforms on the Android menu.
While designed from the ground up for small low-power devices, both run Intel's IA architecture and thus come with an army of developers primed to churn out software. The OHA would be unlikely to axe ARM, but could easily broaden the Android spec to include Intel's silicon would provide manufacturers with a choice of chips.
Bu that's all in the future, and right now the job is getting to Android 1.0. Central to that is the Android software development kit, which allows programmers to start coding.
Google has added a small incentive: a cool US$10m in prize-money for the best Android apps!
The first stage of the Android Developer Challenge, running from January 2nd to March 3rd 2008, will see "the 50 most promising entries... that make use of Android's capabilities to deliver a better mobile experience" score a US$25,000 handout "to fund further development". As the apps come into fruition, Google will dole out 20 follow-up awards, ten of US$275,000 and ten of US$100,000.
The SDK itself runs on Windows XP and Vista, Mac OS 10.4.8 and up, and Ubuntu 6.06 ‘Dapper Drake' or later (although the SDK site notes that ‘other modern distributions of Linux will also likely work but are not directly supported'). It includes an Android emulator so that developers can now see what their apps will look like when running on an Android device, with a choice of screens sizes and form factors.
So if you're a programmer stuck for something to do over the Christmas / New Year break, try your hand at crafting an application for Android - it could just net you anywhere from US$25,000 to a cool US$275,000!
Google Chrome: a new web browser for WindowsThe first thing one notices when running Chrome on a slower PC like mine is that it launches much faster than any other browser. It’s never more than two seconds from the time I double-click the icon on the desktop till the cursor’s blinking in the so-called “Omnibar”, ready to go. That brings me to the second point.
The idea of combining the address bar and the search box is ingenious. To be fair, I believe the ability to search from the address bar has been a feature of Internet Explorer since version 6 or earlier. But it was poorly implemented and, as far as I can remember, it only worked with MSN Search. With Chrome, Google has done it right. As you start typing, the browser offers you results from your history, bookmarks, and Google.com, and puts them in a drop-down menu that doesn’t get in your way, as Safari’s auto-complete always seems to. This, put together with the default speed-dial start page that seems to have been borrowed from Opera, makes Chrome very usable and the user (me!) more efficient. It gets you where you want to go. Quickly.
It’s worth noting that this feature is also one of things about Chrome that’s raised privacy concerns, since a lot of what one types into the Omnibar is sent to Google. Entering text into the Omnibar is equivalent to doing a search on Google.com.
Its extremely bare-bones and non-intrusive UI is another thing that makes it appealing to me. If you look at the amount of space a browser takes up on the screen, you’ll see that from the top down there’s the title bar, the menu bar, the toolbar/address bar, the bookmarks bar, the tab bar, and the status bar at the bottom. In addition to those, one might install a third-party toolbar (Facebook, Google, mininova, etc.). Which doesn’t leave enough room for the content itself! Chrome has taken back some of that UI space. It has done away with the title bar by moving the tab bar to the top. The status bar doesn’t take up as much horizontal space and only appears when you need it (while hovering over a link, for example). And as with IE 7, the menu bar is gone.
John C. Dvorak, one of the hosts of the This Week in Tech podcast, mentioned on last week’s episode of the show that a number of pages didn’t load properly in Chrome for him. I can’t say I’ve experienced the same. The only site that is glitchy and unresponsive for me in Chrome is the ‘new’ Facebook.
Another much talked about feature has been Chrome’s Incognito mode. It’s almost exactly like Safari’s Private Browsing setting. Basically, everything you do in an Incognito window is not stored on your computer. That is, no cookies are saved and the pages you visit aren’t added to the browser’s history.
Download google chrome : http://www.google.com/chrome
.jpg)
